Trump pardoned the January 6 insurrectionists to justify his accusation that there was cheating in the 2020 election—and that he was the real winner. He knew that if he did so it would back up his claim, because if there really was cheating then those people would just be rebelling against the fake election results, and it was justified. By pardoning them, he reinforces his lie to not only them, but to all his supporters who put him in office – and it makes him look like he is innocent.
Trump does not care if they are innocent or guilty. He only cares if he looks innocent or guilty. But Trump has another motive by pardoning them: He has gained their undying loyalty, and they know that if they support him with violence again, he will again pardon them. After all, what would they have to lose? They have now become his Presidential Guard. His private army. The current Republican Party, or should I say Trump Party, and its leaders, are cheering him on, and the few Republicans who hold any power who don’t agree with these pardons will continue to support Trump in silence. They are that fearful. They are cowering in silence.
The situation is that bad.
Of course if we want to keep it simple, Trump pardoned them because he’s just a lying human being who has no morals, principles, or shame. He only wants power. He is a legend in his own mind.
In his inauguration speech, he actually claimed that God saved him so he could save the country. That is the final proof that he has a god complex and really is mentally sick.
His supporters believe every word he says as absolute truth without question, just like the people who followed Hitler, Mussolini—and other despots and dictators throughout history. Weak people need leaders like Trump, strong people don’t. And Trump knows his people are weak and will follow him anywhere. They never question him or seek the truth beyond what he says. Most of what he has said publicly and politically ever since he led the Obama birther movement in 2011 were said for only one reason: Because his followers believe everything he says. Whether it’s true or not does not matter; What’s important is that his followers hear it.
During my over 50 years of being an employer and an employee in the American economy, there is one type of personality that I ran into all the time. And that is someone who’s new to a company who comes in with the idea that they are going to change and fix everything. They are generally pretty young, but always have this feeling that they are superior to others. The other employees who see this new person realize that he’s just another jerk who thinks that they are all inefficient and worthless employees and this guy’s going to fix it.
I was even one of those in my early days until I realized that I’m not superior to these others, and I can’t go in and fix everything because I learned over time that certain practices and habits are there for a reason, and those reasons have often come down over decades and centuries. What I learned was called humility.
Humility is something that Elon Musk needs badly. His money has gone to his head and now he has a God complex. He’s like Trump, who also has a God complex. Trump also thinks that he’s going to come in and fix everything in the world—and that he is superior to everyone else—that only he can fix it.
Someone needs to tell Elon—and Trump, for that matter—that efficiency is not the goal of everything. In fact, efficiency can almost be the bane of human existence.
And this thing with DEI. We need to have a society that’s diverse, equitable and inclusive of all types of people. DEI hiring is often bringing in people who live on the fringes of society because the majority of society, or maybe a large group, doesn’t like them, often because these people are of a different race, religion, sex—or have some other unpopular trait. In other words, they’re prejudiced against them, and they don’t want to deal with them, so these people just fall by the wayside because society doesn’t engage with them. And engagement means that they aren’t as efficient. But efficiency, again, is not the main goal in life, nor should it be in government and society.
What good government and a good society should be has yet to be determined; It’s a work in progress, although there are a lot of people who are convinced that they know exactly what it should be and they want to force that on everyone else—except the idea of democracy, which is only defined as rule by the people—and is also a work in progress—stands in their way.
Elon should understand all this. After all, he grew up in South Africa, a place where the majority of the people who were black were once ruled by the minority of the people, who were white. The white people just didn’t like the black people. They thought they were superior to the blacks. Democracy came along and changed all that. And that is still a work in progress. But Elon, who is white, left. Maybe it wasn’t efficient enough for him.
How Poor Procedures for Measuring Blood Pressure Often Indicate False High Blood Pressure
Are you certain that your doctor’s office is measuring blood pressure correctly? Because if it’s not, then the doctor could be using inaccurate results to advise you on your health, often leading to you taking unnecessary drugs for high (or low) blood pressure that you don’t have. Some might think that of course they measure your blood pressure correctly. After all, it’s done at the doctor’s office. That’s what I thought—until I learned the truth that inaccurate measuring of blood pressure is very common, not only at the doctor’s office, but also when the patient measures their own blood pressure at home. Here’s what happened to me—and how I learned to accurately measure my own blood pressure and to know when medical workers are doing it incorrectly. I also learned that I didn’t have high blood pressure, although the doctor told me I did—and his opinion was based on the false readings I received in his offices and in my home (before I learned how to properly measure my own blood pressure).
How it All Began: A Medical Worker First Tells Me I Have High Blood Pressure
In 2023, I went to see a new doctor for an ailment that was not urgent or critical. When I arrived at the appointed time, I went through a process that’s common in every doctor’s’ office I’ve been to. I first took care of paperwork, then waited in the reception area. Next, I was taken to a room and waited in a chair. Shortly afterwords, an assistant came in and took my weight and height.
Then the assistant measured my blood pressure. I was sitting in an armchair—a simple metal chair with cushioned seat and back, like an inexpensive dining room chair. The doctor’s assistant put the blood-pressure cuff on my right arm and told me to sit up with my back supported and put my feet flat on the floor, which I did. I was wearing a short-sleeved shirt with a T-shirt under it. I started to pull my sleeves up so she could put it on my bare skin when she said she could put it over the clothing. She then turned on the device and took a reading.
Then she said, “Your blood pressure is high.”
Little did I know the medical roller coaster I was about to go on. This is the same “general” procedure for measuring blood pressure (BP)—with some small differences—used in every doctor’s office I’ve been to in the previous 20-plus years. I’ve gone through this at least 10 times during this period. Each time, the attendant told me my blood pressure. In all these cases, the attendant who took my BP also told me what the reading numbers were, but I never paid attention to it before and never knew what the numbers meant. Why? Because a doctor never mentioned the words “blood pressure” to me in my 75 years (or more specifically, since I became an adult), so I ignored it. But in this instance, for the first time in my life, the assistant said to me, “Your blood pressure is high.” She also told me the numbers, but I knew nothing about the meaning of the numbers.
I’ve been extremely healthy my whole life and spent very little time with doctors. I’ve never had a regular doctor, and I’ve taken care of my health since I was in college in my 20s, plus my parents kept me healthy. And I am in great health now—minus this current minor ailment that drove me to see a doctor.
The doctor came in shortly after the assistant left the room. I talked about my health history and lifestyle. We discussed the reason I was there, and a little about the medical group that he was associated with, EZX Health (a fictitious company I made up). It was our first meeting, and we did not discuss my blood pressure, possibly because of a time constraint. We set another appointment for one week later.
I went home concerned my blood pressure was high. But I did not remember the numbers. The next morning, I opened an email summary of my appointment, which I read through a patient portal. The BP numbers were in the summary. My BP was at 153/96. Since I didn’t know anything about BP numbers, I looked it up online and yes, those numbers were quite high. I was greatly concerned and a bit worried. In fact, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. It kept me up at night for the coming week.
Little did I know—with my limited knowledge of how blood pressure was measured—the journey I was about to go on that would completely alter my view of doctors and the procedures used in many of their offices to check patients’ blood pressure.
Measuring Blood Pressure at Home
I started thinking about how to get another BP reading before my second appointment one week after the first. Since I had been healthy my whole life and lived a healthy lifestyle, I was a bit worried. Two days before the second appointment, I came up with the idea of getting a home blood pressure monitor. I knew absolutely nothing about them. I researched the internet and found out I could buy an Omron, a respected name in home monitors, within minutes from home. I bought one that day.
When I got home about 5:30, I opened the box and went to the “Quick Start Guide,” which led me to calling Omron. An attendant on the phone walked me through my first reading, telling me how to put the cuff on and tighten it, allowing two fingers (no more and no fewer) to fit comfortably in between the cuff and the arm. She also told me how to connect my cellphone to the monitor through the Omron app. At this point, I knew nothing about how to take a BP reading. This was my first lesson. My first reading (over the phone) showed my BP at 153/104—very close to the doctor’s office reading. Now I was even more concerned. After the phone call with Omron, I took two more readings that afternoon: 130/99 and 134/96. That was better by a lot, but I didn’t know why.
In fact, I was still a real novice to this whole blood pressure business. And I wondered why the readings are so different from each other, even when one is taken right after another. I took more readings: the next morning after coffee; then the next afternoon around 5pm; and another the following morning. I took two readings each time and all were in the 130s, 140s, even one at 151. And the diastolic readings (the second number) were all in the 80s, 90s and higher. From my elementary knowledge of BP numbers, I knew these were all high, but I still had no idea why each reading was different.
I later learned that I knew basically nothing about blood pressure when I walked into the second appointment. I always thought that taking your blood pressure was easy. I always had it done in a medical office by an assistant and trusted the results. That’s all I knew.
My Second Appointment — One Week After the First
At my second appointment, the procedure was the same: After measuring my weight, the assistant took my blood pressure using the same procedure as before. She put the cuff on over my two shirts while I was sitting down, told me to sit up and put my feet flat on the floor and turned it on. She again said my blood pressure was high at 157/103. She then asked me if I wanted her to take my BP after I met with the doctor. I said yes.
When the doctor came in, we discussed the original health problem I came to him for, and what tests we would do next. Mainly, we discussed my high blood pressure as I was anxious to do so.
Click on image to view larger readable image
I showed him the results from my home monitor that were recorded on my cellphone app, telling him that I just bought the monitor two days before. My readings were still high, and he wrote some of them down. By the end of the meeting, he had me totally convinced that I had high blood pressure.
Immediately after the meeting, the assistant came in and took my blood pressure using the same procedure, and again, it was high at 148/96. At this second reading, she put it on my left arm. The other readings were on my right arm. I had no idea if that mattered.
We set another appointment for five weeks later. I went home again, concerned about my blood pressure being high. I took two more readings at home at about 5pm. They were high. Little did I know how much I still had to learn. At the second appointment, while I was waiting for the doctor to come in, I noticed on the inside side of the closed door, a poster on how to properly measure blood pressure. The poster is for home BP measuring since the text instructs the reader to measure in the morning “before medications.” The image and its text also show the cusp should be over bare skin. I mentioned this to the doctor. The assistant who took my blood pressure must have never read the poster, since she put it over my clothing each time. Or maybe in the doctor’s office it doesn’t matter. After all, they should know. Right? But after seeing the poster, I first began to wonder about the procedures used for measuring my blood pressure.
Why Worry About My Blood Pressure?
Why was I so concerned about my blood pressure? Being healthy has been one of my main goals since I was young. I had a healthy upbringing. Plus, we had free healthcare because my father was a military officer. When I was in college in the 1960s, there was a food revolution going on, and I’ve tried to eat healthy ever since. And I’ve always exercised. I’m a hiker, swimmer, cyclist, sailor and more. That’s why, at 75, I’m doing great. And I’ve never taken any prescribed medication. But seeing a doctor regularly was not part of that regimen over the years. I saw a doctor only when I needed one, which was rare. I am not overweight, have great energy and feel great. I meditate every morning and most afternoons. Every day I stretch, do various other exercises, and then have a light workout with weights. So, when I was told I had high blood pressure, I was shocked and worried.
Over the years, I’ve learned some causes of high blood pressure, and there are, in general, only two solutions: Medication and/or change lifestyle. I’m very educated about what a healthy lifestyle is, and I knew that if I had to change my lifestyle, there is nothing I would change to improve it to be healthier. Consequently, I had to figure out what was going on. I had to investigate the readings. They were all over the place, especially at the doctor’s office, where they were consistently high. I wanted to know why. And why do they change every time I took a reading?
I always thought that when a medical person took my blood pressure, that it was some complex system that checks it, that it can be taken at any time on either arm, was easy to do and very accurate. The more I learned, the more I realized how little I knew.
I Learn More and More About Measuring Blood Pressure Properly
The day after my second appointment, I took readings in the morning, and they were high. I decided it was time I read the monitor’s instruction manual since I was still using the Quick Start Guide. I learned some very amazing facts in the manual, facts that are so simple that they changed everything. First, when I took my BP reading over the phone with Omron, I was sitting in a cushioned chair that had a table on my right, so I attached the cuff to my right arm, which I rested on the table (it was barely below the armrest). Plus, at the medical office at the first appointment, the assistant took my first BP reading with the cuff on my right arm. At the second appointment, the first reading was on my right arm and the second one was on my left arm.
The instruction manual said to put the cuff in a different position if using it on the right arm. From then on in, I moved it to the left arm, and positioned it according to the instructions. (How to measure for the right or left arm were the instructions for my monitor. They might be different for other makes or models.) As I read the instruction manual, I also started researching BP-measuring procedures online through articles, studies, YouTube videos and blood pressure forums.
Another revelation was that I never knew that you are supposed to rest for at least five minutes before taking a reading. As I look back on that, I find that truly amazing. As it turns out, that is one of the most important procedures for getting a reliable reading of your “true” blood pressure. Why did I not know this? Because in all the times I had my blood pressure taken in a medical office, including at the EZX Health office, no one ever told me to rest before a reading—and rest for at least five minutes. Why did no one ever tell me that? Don’t they know? They’re medical workers. They’re supposed to know.
The arm should be raised so the middle of the cuff is approximately the same height as the middle of the heart. This can change depending on the individual, but for the average adult sitting in a standard height chair, like a dining or desk chair, the height of a standard dining or desk table sets the cuff at the correct height.
I also learned that your arm should be raised so that the middle of the cuff is approximately equal to the level of your heart. In the past, I know that some attendants did raise my arm, but in some of those cases, I even had to hold it up. With others, they had a table to rest my arm on. Others used the armrest of a chair, which I learned is generally not high enough for the average adult. There was no standard that I ever saw. At the EZX Health office, I was never told my arm should be raised to the correct level. It was just resting on the arm rest, or barely raised at all. At the first visit, I was sitting in an armchair with arm rests. In the second visit, I was sitting in a chair with no arm rests and both tests were done without raising my arm any more than necessary so the assistant could put the cuff on from her standing position. There was no consistency in the arm position.
Another important practice is that the cuff should always go over bare skin. I’ve had some medical workers tell me that, but I didn’t pay much attention. But in the EZX Health office, the assistant put it over the two shirts I had on for all three readings that were taken over two appointments, one at the first visit and two at the second (with about 30 minutes between readings which was when I was talking to the doctor).
Another thing I learned that I have never seen done in a doctor’s office, including EZX Health, is that you should always take at least two readings and average the two. Some recommend three readings, then discard the first and average the next two. And they should be taken consecutively with at least a 1-minute rest between readings. No source I found online says one reading is enough, but one is all I’ve ever experienced.
You should also never talk while resting or while the reading is being taken. I began to notice the differences in the readings at home as I changed the procedure; they got lower. But they still were not consistent, going up and down on every reading—and I didn’t know why. I was still taking readings in the morning and at 5pm—until I learned that the best time, when you are the most rested, is in the early morning, 30-60 minutes after you get out of bed—before coffee, eating, or exercise. The next best time is late evening—at least an hour or so after eating (including no deserts) and no exercise beforehand. The worst time was in the middle of the day. From that point on, I only took readings in the morning.
Over the next few days, I experimented with being comfortable in an upright chair where I can sit up with my feet flat on the floor and rest. I used a light table I had and chose a throw cushion so I could rest my arm on it, palm up, at the height I needed, allowing the tube from the cuff to run along my forearm to the monitor. Then I learned to place the monitor so I can easily press the start button and take a reading. Another essential procedure is to make sure you do not have to pee, as it can really raise your reading if you do. I’ve never been asked that at a doctor’s office: “Do you need to pee, as it will affect your BP reading if you do?” All and all, if you are taking your blood pressure yourself, the final instruction is to take it at the same time each day for several days and you will get a good “baseline.”
There is No Such Thing as Your “True” Blood Pressure
In summary, what I learned with all of the above details on the proper procedure for measuring your blood pressure was that there is no “magical” blood pressure that you have. It’s not like, “Your blood pressure is 110/80.” If that was the results of a reading, it’s the reading for that moment under the conditions that it was measured in using the device (the monitor) you used. If someone tells you that such and such is your blood pressure, then they don’t understand what it means, or they are saying something they shouldn’t be saying. If a doctor says that, then keep an eye on them and don’t trust them completely. But a doctor, as well as a nurse, should know this (or at least I am sure they knew it at one time), but an assistant probably doesn’t (although five minutes of instruction should be enough to inform them to never say, “That is your blood pressure”).
All medical workers should really say—if they want to give you an honest and informed answer—”We measured your blood pressure as…” Then they should tell you what that measurement means and how it is not necessarily your “true” blood pressure. It’s what they measured today, at this time in this place and in these conditions at this location. We are alive and constantly in a state of change, even when asleep. It will be extremely rare that you will get the same exact blood pressure read even just two times in a row. What they don’t tell you—probably because they don’t want to take the time to tell you—and because they often think you should just listen to them without question and do as they say—is that there is no exact measurement that is your blood pressure.
Your BP changes constantly all day as you walk, eat, talk, work, sleep, etc., etc., etc. What you need to do is find a “baseline” that will give an indication of what your blood pressure is. A blood pressure “baseline” is similar to finding your “true” weight. As you eat and move around all day, your weight goes up and down. Two eight-ounce cups of coffee (or almost any liquid) is one pound. But that doesn’t mean that you just increased your weight by one pound. If you pee one cup five minutes later, you just lost a half pound. It’s the same for exercise. You can lose a half pound with just exercise. In other words, all day long your weight goes up and down. So how do you find your “true” weight? You take it at the same time every day when you have the least amount of changes. It’s not perfect, but it’s the best-known way to measure your true weight. So, you weigh yourself, naked, first thing in the morning right after you pee. That is your “baseline” and the truest weight you can measure over time. But it’s never perfect, it’s just the best we can do. It’s a baseline.
What is a Blood Pressure Baseline and How Do You Get It?
A baseline for blood pressure is what you are seeking. But it’s less exact than finding your “true weight,” because it’s more complex to put a cuff on your arm and measure the heart pumping. The medical world has established that the best way to find a good baseline is to put yourself in a “rested state” when your body has had enough time to slow down, and to be in a physical position which is somewhat close to your truest resting state, without outside and personal interferences that can be changed easily. And your mental state can cause your blood pressure to go up and down, so it needs to be calm and relaxed. It’s when your body is not digesting lots of food, including stimulants like coffee, alcohol, cigarettes, sugar, drugs, etc. And since your blood pressure includes movement of blood throughout your body, you need be in a physical, sitting position that minimizes hindering or stimulating blood flow, like sitting comfortably with feet flat on the floor and in an upright position with a relatively straight back. And you should take the reading over several days, like five to seven days and average the readings each day and then average the daily averages.
The medical community has determined that the best way to get a baseline is to first take the reading in the early morning 30-60 minutes after you get up (after you get up, NOT after you wake up), in a sitting position (sitting up in a comfortable straight-back chair), with your feet flat on the floor. The monitor cuff should be above your inside elbow crease (1/2 inch above on my monitor instructions), and not too tight or too loose (based on monitor instructions, fit two or three fingers comfortably between the cusp and bare skin). You should not have to take a pee (that can raise your BP considerably if you do), and you should not talk while the reading is being taken. You also should not have eaten, exercised, smoked, or drank coffee, etc., at least 30 minutes before. And you should rest, with the cuff on, for at least 5 minutes before the reading—without any outside distractions and in a restful environment. All these conditions are generalizations to try and get you in a rested, baseline state—and to get the best reading, you should do everything possible to get into that state.
Another very important factor is the device being used, and it is recommended using a device where the cuff is on your upper arm only, not one on your wrist. You also must follow the manufacturer’s instructions. For example, the height of your arm the cuff is on. This too is a guide—not an exact position. The center of the cusp should be approximately the same height as your heart. That point is approximately the same point used to put pressure on the heart in CPR. It is found by finding the bottom of the sternum and measuring up two fingers width. The area above that point is where you put your palm to press on the heart for CPR. That area should approximately align with the center of the cuff. Some say it is the same point as the nipples, which is correct for an average adult, although this can vary considerably with people depending on age, weight and sex. A small high or low difference is insignificant, but way too low, like letting your arm hang straight down from your shoulder, can give a higher reading, and way to high can give a lower reading. For an average-size adult sitting in a chair, like a dining room or desk chair, your arm resting on the table or desktop, works well. But your doctor should be able to tell you the most exact height. But don’t always listen to the medical worker, who might be an assistant who is not well-trained in taking blood pressure.
Once you get the proper procedures down, then you need to measure you blood pressure at the same time every day for several days, maybe a week. Then, taking all the averages, and discarding any extreme readings, you can achieve a good baseline that will give you a good indication of what your blood pressure is. It will end up to be a final figure, but with your new knowledge of how you got to that point, you can now see that one reading, or just a few, is not even close to being enough information to judge what your blood pressure is. Relying on one measurement is just stupid. And if the procedures are poor on top of that, it’s downright ridiculous.
Why doctors don’t explain all this in their first meeting with you when the topic of blood pressure is discussed is beyond me. No one ever told me. But, actually, I think they don’t want to take the time to do it. And sometimes, they don’t want to pay for all the extra time of having you rest, getting comfortable, and taking more than one reading—all under the direction of a medical worker, who is rarely a doctor. To get a good baseline requires more time, and more time in the doctor’s office, especially if it’s done by a doctor, can be expensive. That’s why blood pressure measuring is almost always done by a lower-cost medical worker. After all, medicine is a business. And, unfortunately, business is often a top priority. Sometimes, it’s the main priority. Today, many doctors don’t run their own practice, but are part of a larger, profit-making enterprise that controls costs that are not always in the patient’s best interests.
I Finally Get “Consistent” Results Measuring Blood Pressure at Home
Over the next few days after I learned the above information, I refined my procedure using not only the monitor instruction manual, but also from extensive online research. I decided that on the evening before I was going to take a reading, I would set up my chair, and the table and cushion my arm rested on. I then placed the monitor in the correct position for taking a reading. This way, in the morning, I would not be spending energy to get all this together. I did everything I could to maximize the chances of getting the best reading in a rested state 30-60 minutes after getting up.
In the morning, I sat in the chair and put the cuff on my left arm according to the guidelines and instructions. It only took a few minutes since everything was in place. Then, with the cuff on, I rested for 5 minutes (many recommend doing this—rest with cuff on, even in the medical office), using the stopwatch on my phone (with a gentle sound when the time is up), After the first reading, I took two more, resting one minute between them.
I was pleasantly surprised that my first readings under my “controlled” conditions were lower than my previous readings and far lower than those at the doctor’s office. I took three readings. The first was 117/85, the second was 126/86, and the third was 121/85. Over my first two appointments in the EZX Health office, the three readings taken were: 153/96; 157/103; 148/96. That’s a huge difference. That’s enough of a difference to change everything in my case. I felt exonerated—no longer with the worry that I might have high blood pressure. (I am not going to discuss here what the exact numbers should be, since your doctor should be advising you on that.)
The correct way to measure your own blood pressure – sitting up in a straight-back chair with feet flat on the ground and the arm is resting on a table so that the center of the cuff is raised to be level with the heart.
For the next five days, I took three readings every morning with the same procedure. I made notes on each reading. After six days, I took the average of all three every day and then averaged all those averages. The final average was 121/86. That’s a far cry from the three readings at the medical office which were: 153/96; 157/103; 148/96. In other words, I established a baseline. It was an average established over six days using procedures recommended by the medical community.
As I look back to the second appointment when the doctor and I compared my home readings being remarkably like the readings taken in his offices, I realized that my first home readings that I showed him were done using the same bad procedures as used by his assistant. So, of course there’s going to be poor results. With what little I knew about procedures at the time, counting on my home readings was just as bad as counting on the office readings.
Can You Trust a Blood Pressure Reading Taken in a Doctor’s Office?
I was pleased that all my research on procedure showed me exactly what I had read in many articles and videos online: You cannot trust readings that are not properly taken, which happens in medical offices all the time—and it also happens at home. Yet what have I learned? Be very careful about the readings you get in a medical office, as well as at home. You probably can’t trust them unless you know the proper procedures. And what I have seen over the years—and currently learned online—is that this is common practice throughout the medical community in a doctor’s office.
Out of 10-plus BP readings I have had in a doctor’s office in the last 20 years, not one followed the proper and recommended procedures. In fact, not one was even close. I started asking myself. How can that be? How can it be that you can’t necessarily trust the blood pressure readings taken in a doctor’s office? That’s where you should be able to totally trust them. Decisions on whether or not you need to be on blood pressure medication are partially based on these readings. They are at the least an essential and prominent determining factor that your doctor will use in deciding on whether or not you need to be on medication, or to change your lifestyle, or both.
The doctor, in his daily summary of our second meeting (I accessed the summaries through an online portal), suggested that he would, at the next visit, “consider initiating antihypertensive therapy if readings remain consistently elevated.” One thing was for certain in his mind: I have high blood pressure. He’s basing that belief based on faulty BP measurements in his office and at my home. But I began to wonder: How many people in the U.S. are on blood pressure medication who don’t need it because of poor procedures used in reading BP, not only in medical offices, but also in home readings? After all, the doctor didn’t question me on my procedures. In his mind, my readings confirmed his office’s readings. How can he miss such an obvious problem?
The Procedures Recommended by the Medical Community for Measuring Blood Pressure
After many hours and days of research on the internet, below is what I have found is the recommended procedure that should be used in a medical office. These guidelines are basically for everyone, but cuff size, chair, and table height to rest your arm on could vary considerably, depending on the individuals size, age and weight. Below is a result of reading the AMA guidelines, as well as other guidelines and practices I found that are recommended by doctors and other medical professionals. There are so many studies and resources out there that it’s impossible to count them—which makes me wonder why poor procedures are so common. The reader should keep in mind that I am a layman. I do not claim that the below procedures are correct. This is just what my research has found. You should really confirm them yourself. I am only trying to spread the word that you should not trust blood pressure readings unless you know the proper procedures both at a medical office and at home. Don’t trust what the doctor says blindly.
How Your Blood Pressure Should be Read at the Doctor’s Office
Here is what I have learned. I am not a doctor, nor do I have any medical training, but I learned a lot because of a bad experience I had, which prompted me to research the subject. Verify everything for yourself. I have included links at the end of this article to many websites for more information.
The bottom procedure could change depending on the patient’s condition. A doctor will know what is correct, but it’s best to double-check them, since they aren’t all at the top of their game.
First ask the patient if they have to pee, telling them it’s best for a good BP reading.
Put the patient in a comfortable chair with armrests—because armrests are comfortable.
Have a table next to the chair that will allow the patient to easily and comfortably rest their arm on the table with their palm up, so that the middle of the cusp is level with the heart. Be able to adjust the arm height as needed in some way to get it close to ideal.
If this is the patient’s first visit, measure the BP on each arm and use the arm with the highest reading then and in the future.
Ask the patient if they ate recently and what (some foods take longer to digest). Also ask if they smoked, drank coffee or alcohol, or if they exercised before the appointment—and how much and when. All these comments should be written down every time the BP is measured on a checklist. Then the doctor can take the conditions into account—and tell the patient that.
The cusp should be attached in the correct position (height above elbow crease depending on monitor instructions) to the correct arm over bare skin. According to recommendations by most groups, the correct-size cusp should be placed over the arm so that two fingers can easily be inserted between the cusp and the arm (some cusps might state three fingers, depending on manufacturer’s instructions). It is essential that the cusp be the right size for the arm. It is recommended that every medical office have an assortment of cusp sizes easily available. (Wrong cusp size is the number one cause for incorrect measurements, according to the AMA.)
After the cusp is on, the patient is informed that they should sit up with back straight and rest their feet flat on the floor, legs not crossed. Then the attendant should tell them that they need rest for five minutes, with no talking, to get an accurate meeting. It is best if they rest with the cuff on. The patient should also be told they will take two (or three, which is best) measurements and they will rest at least 1 minute between readings, and they will discard the first reading and take the average of the next two or average the two, if only two are taken. Then the attendant leaves the room and turns the lights off, or better still, leaves them in a low light environment.
When the attendant returns, the patient should be told not to talk during the measurement. Do not engage them in conversation. Then the monitor is turned on and the measurement taken.
One or two more measurements are taken, resting between them. If any two are drastically different, then take another reading and discard one. Generally, taking three and discarding the first, and then averaging the next two, is the best result.
The correct way to measure blood pressure. The patient is sitting up in a straight-back chair, with feet flat on the ground and with the arm resting on a table, which raises the cuff to the correct height.
Procedures Used When My Blood Pressure was Measured at the EZX Health Medical Office
I had three measurements taken at EZX Health: One at the first visit and two at the second (these two were separated by about 30 minutes). All three procedures were the same with a few insignificant differences:
The assistant took me to a room where I sat in a chair with arm rests (At my second appointment, the chair had no armrests).
I was not asked if I have to pee.
The assistant put the cuff on my arm over my two shirts (at both appointments, three readings total). Based on what I later learned, the assistant took little care in placing the arm height correctly. There was no table for my arm. And she did not place the cuff in a certain position above the crease in the elbow. My monitor says ½ inch. And no care was taken for the tightness of the cuff.
She told me to sit up and put my feet flat on the floor.
We talked off and on during the procedure, but she never mentioned no talking.
She only took one reading each time.
I was never told to rest at any point at both appointments.
Although the reading at the first appointment was taken on the right arm, the two on the second appointment were taken on the left arm. There was no consistency.
A medical worker checking blood pressure with the patient in a poor position to get a good reading. Patient is not sitting up in a straight-back chair with feet flat on floor, but with legs crossed, sitting back on a couch.
Everyone Does it That Way
But the real problem, as mentioned above is: How can this be—that you can’t trust the blood pressure measurements taken at the doctor’s office—the one place that you should be able to trust?
Are they responsible? Or are they just normal?
Or: “Everyone does it that way.”
Since every procedure I’ve experienced in every medical office I’ve been to also has poor procedures—then I would have to blame the medical community in general. They all share this responsibility. What could be more important than correctly measuring your blood pressure? And what does it lead to if the measuring process falsely indicates high blood pressure that requires “Antihypertensive Therapy”—which generally includes medication?
“Initiating Antihypertensive Therapy”
In the summary, the doctor had written up on my second visit, it stated (emphasis mine), referring to my blood pressure:
Patient’s self-monitoring of blood pressure at home has consistently shown elevated readings—most in 130s up to high of 150s SBP. Will reassess blood pressure at the next visit and consider initiating antihypertensive therapy if readings remain consistently elevated. Please continue monitoring your blood pressure at home using your Omron device and follow proper procedures for accurate readings.
In the above comments, it states that he “would consider initiating antihypertensive therapy if readings remain consistently elevated.” With my new knowledge since that last meeting, that means he would be considering medication as one of the main aspects of “antihypertensive therapy”—partly based on the BP readings taken at his office, which were done incorrectly. They would also be based on readings I took at home—when I didn’t have a clue how to properly take a reading. In other words, the procedures I used to measure BP at home were just as unreliable as the procedures used in the doctor’s office.
The doctor mentions in the above visit summary to make sure I “follow proper procedures for accurate readings” when I take the readings, yet he didn’t ask me one question about my procedure, so how could the doctor know? I told the doctor I bought the monitor less than two days before. I certainly did not become an expert in less than two days. During my first reading I was talking on the phone with Omron. Believe me, “talking on phone” during a reading is not an acceptable part of the proper procedure when checking your blood pressure.
Maybe the doctor didn’t know what the “proper procedures” were, since all the readings taken in their office weren’t even close to “proper.” I am certain though, that he knew at one time (from his original training—see the comments from the “27 Sources…” article in the next section below). I started to wonder: How many millions of people are on blood pressure medication who don’t need to be because the readings are poorly taken? I’d read many comments on discussion forums that discuss blood pressure and there is an entire world of people out there who don’t know anything about proper procedures, are scared to get their BP measured at a doctor’s office, are very worried about their BP being too high and are confused. Many take their BP and don’t know how to do so correctly. According to a 2017 analysis, 61.9 million adults in the United States were taking antihypertensive medication. Really?
How Prevalent are Poor Procedures for Measuring Blood Pressure in the Medical Community?
In my research, I found a large number of studies and opinions on the state of BP reading procedures. Below are two examples that help illustrate what is happening. Every health care worker should read these—or at least the excerpts below to perhaps gain a little humility—besides learning the truth about the state of measuring blood pressure in medical offices (and hospitals – see below).
A Study Involving 172 Health Care Workers
This is a 1995 study at a major city hospital. The full article should be read. It involved 172 health care workers, GPs, specialists, nurses.
“Evaluation of the Technique Used by Health-Care Workers for Taking Blood Pressure”
Excerpt:
Practical Test
All of the groups were notably inaccurate in the practical test. Only 3% of the general practitioners and 2% of the nurses obtained reliable results (P=NS in any group) (Fig 1). Arm and cuff positions were inadequate in 73%. Only 3% used the stethoscope bell.
Blood Pressure
Sixty-three percent of examinees were out of range in their readings of systolic BP (46% incorrect positive, 54% incorrect negative) and 53% in diastolic BP (40% incorrect positive, 60% incorrect negative). The nurses had the highest out-of-range values in both BP readings (P<.03 versus surgical specialists).
The above is a 1995 study, but what it shows is how long this problem has been going on and probably added to how the term “white coat syndrome” got started. To read the entire study, go to: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.HYP.26.6.1204
“27 Sources of Error in Blood Pressure Readings”
Below is a 2023 article from the American Medical Assoc., and a good summation of the problem that shows how it is still happening.
“Are you sure you’re accurately measuring BP? Here’s how to know”
Excerpt (italic emphasis and text color is mine):
Twenty-seven. That’s how many potential sources of error can falsely raise or lower a patient’s blood pressure reading. Eight of these potential errors involve patient-related factors such as caffeine use or bladder distension. But the 19 others can be managed by the care team—including use of the properly sized cuff, sufficient rest prior to measurement, proper positioning, and using a validated, calibrated device. That’s a lot for anyone to account for without proper or recent training. And there’s the rub: Care team members are not often supported with the tools and training to measure BP accurately. Many health professionals were trained only once, like during medical or nursing school, but never again. It’s not as easy as you think “Many of us start to get the feeling that blood-pressure measurement is bread and butter—we can do it in our sleep—but it’s actually a very complex skill. And because it’s a complex skill, training is really important,” Kate Kirley, MD, a family physician and director of chronic disease prevention at the AMA, said during an AMA webinar. “All health care professionals need to be trained in how to take an accurate blood pressure measurement, and we should all be receiving retraining every six months to one year, according to the clinical guidelines,” Dr. Kirley said. “This is because our skills in blood pressure measurement decay over time.”
The White Coat Syndrome — How Did it Really Get Started?
At my second visit, the assistant who took my BP asked me if I had “White coat syndrome?” I asked her what that was. She said it was patients who get nervous and had a high reading when they have their BP measured because it’s being measured by a medical worker in a white coat. I obviously didn’t have it because I never had anyone ever tell me I had high blood pressure, so how could I be afraid of it being measured?
Previously, I naively looked at measuring blood pressure the same way I looked at measuring my height. After learning how blood pressure is supposed to be measured, I started to wonder how this term came to be. I had learned that measuring BP in a medical office could be unreliable because of poor procedures that lead to false readings. Perhaps, that’s the reason people get high readings around people in “white coats.” I’ve seen nothing but poor BP measuring procedures, so what came first? The poor procedures or the high readings?
Doctors generally believe they always know what’s best for a patient, and patients don’t. That might be generally true, but in my mind, it’s likely that medical staff invented the term, blaming it on the patient and not on the BP measuring procedures they use. The above study from 1995 shows how this problem goes back at least three decades. It’s become a self-fulfilling prophecy: Patients believe the doctors when they tell them they have high blood pressure. Every time a patient goes to the doctor, the poor procedures show they have high blood pressure, so it makes them nervous—and they have high blood pressure.
I am sure there are people who have white coat syndrome as it’s been known traditionally. But now, with my new knowledge of what is good procedures, I wonder how many people have high blood pressure in a doctor’s office because of poor procedures in those offices. So, what came first? The high readings or the poor procedures? One thing I learned from forums is that many people don’t know the proper procedures for reading their blood pressure at home. I am sure many just copy the procedures at the doctor’s office, thinking they must be doing it right. After all, they would know the correct procedure. Or would they? But I also wonder if the procedures at home are better than in a doctor’s office, then they should get lower results. Then their BP gets poorly measured in a doctor’s office and the medical staff says they have “white coat syndrome.”
If the medical community starts using correct procedures, then patients will start imitating them at home. And if the medical community also starts training people to properly take readings at home, then they can be assured that the home readings are reliable. Just telling patients to follow good procedures is the same as no training. But the training needs to be excellent and regularly updated. After all, I am sure that office assistants and doctors were once instructed on good procedures (although I wonder about the quality of instruction assistants receive). How well has that worked out?
When are the Best Times for Measuring Blood Pressure?
The majority of the medical community agrees that the best time to take your blood pressure is in the morning, but there’s a lot of variables, so verify everything with your own research. It’s not that the doctors don’t know, it’s that they often don’t enforce what is going on in their offices because they assume they are correct, or that the medical worker should know because they were trained (hopefully). Just don’t assume that practices for measuring are always correct. After all, how often has your doctor taken your blood pressure? They might have forgotten their training. For the best information, go to the American Medical Association web page that discusses it. An informed doctor who is on top of things might tell you to take your BP at home at different times. Each case can be different. (Also read the links below to learn more about taking your blood pressure.)
And remember: The worst time of the day to measure blood pressure is during the day when you are out and about working, playing, exercising—and seeing your lawyer, or your accountant or… your doctor. Your readings can be very high in these conditions, and if theirs lots of anxiety when you measure your blood pressure, it could be higher even still. Remember that the purpose of a good blood pressure reading is to get a good basepoint to use to judge your health. So take care and do it correctly.
So, What Do I Do Next?
The differences between my BP measurements at home were so great from the readings I received at the medical office, that I was very relieved that I didn’t have high blood pressure. But I was also a little irritated. Irritated that a doctor’s office, which I trusted, had put me through an unpleasant experience that they created from poor and misleading procedures. (What also annoyed me was that I paid the doctor and the company that employed him for these sloppy procedures and putting me through the aggravation I experienced. A refund would have been nice, but I’d be dreaming to get that.)
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the U.S. Everyone should be extremely careful in measuring it. When you go to the doctor, you should be able to count on them to measure it with every care. I had completely lost my trust. I next started asking myself, “What do I do next?” I knew I had to first show my doctor what BP levels I found in my home readings. And I needed to explain how I got there, that I heavily studied how blood pressure is measured, and then put what I learned into practice. Consequently, I learned that it wasn’t being done in their offices correctly—and not only were they not correct, but they were also extremely poor. They were worse than a waste of time, causing more harm than help.
So, with all this new-found knowledge I now have, what am I going to do about it? Should I tell my doctor? Or should I just sit and do nothing and let him go on believing that I have high blood pressure? I knew I had to do something. I had to at least tell him my story that I don’t have high blood pressure. Knowing that the doctor would take it all as criticism, I was nervous and planned out what I was going to say. But I wanted to make it so that he would wake up to the problem. If my words were going to be taken as criticism, then so be it. That at least would get his attention and that’s what I needed.
I also knew our doctor/patient relationship would be different from that moment on—maybe even come to an end. But I had to speak the truth and let the chips fall where they fall. I was concerned that the reaction to my “criticisms” was going to be negative, so I planned to tell the doctor to not take any notes (and no recording of the meeting, which was done, with my permission, at the first two appointments), so there would be no record of me criticizing what he was partially responsible for. I wanted to inform him of the sloppy procedures being used without anyone else knowing I was complaining. I figured the doctor would awaken to the problem and proceed to fix it himself if he was the one getting the credit. I knew the meeting would be difficult.
I couldn’t have cared less that someone knew I was complaining, but I knew that if the doctor initiated changes, it’s more likely that they would happen than if the doctor told others in the office that he was making changes because a patient criticized their procedures and why. That would make him look bad and it wouldn’t end well.
I Tell My Doctor What I’ve Learned
When I went to my next appointment, which was for an annual physical, I told the doctor’s assistant in the beginning not to take my blood pressure, but that I wanted to talk to the doctor first. The assistant left the room, and the doctor came in a little later. I proceeded to tell the doctor my experience. Even though I planned out everything I was going to say, the meeting didn’t go as planned, and it was a bit of a confrontation. But so be it.
I left the doctor’s office and never returned. And I knew that I would never want to see him again or deal with his medical group again (although there were other reasons I didn’t like the company), not only because they had sloppy blood-pressure-measuring procedures, but because too much had passed between us to have a viable relationship. This all happened in 2023. Time will tell if I hear of any changes to their procedures. But how would I know anyway? It’s not like it’s public knowledge, and I doubt they want this information public.
My next plan was to do what I can to let the public know what are good blood-pressure-measuring procedures, both at home and in a medical office. My research has shown that there is a trend in the national medical organizations, like the AMA (American Medical Association), to get doctor’s offices to improve their procedures. I wrote about this above and I will repeat it here. For a long list of articles, written for doctors on how to properly measure blood pressure in their offices, go to: https://www.ama-assn.org/search?search=measuring+bp
In Conclusion
Was I accusing my doctor and EZX Health of doing something wrong? To a certain extent, yes. But I am accusing them, along with much of the medical community, of what I see as a practice that is common across the country: Sloppy procedures for taking blood pressure readings in medical offices that could lead to prescribing unnecessary medication—besides misleading a lot of people who worry about their blood pressure.
My doctor and EZX Health are not unique in this. “Everybody does it.” It is, at the very least, quite common. And why do I think it’s common? Not just because of all my experiences in doctor’s offices, but also because I found that the internet was strewn with hundreds of articles, forum comments and YouTube videos—all saying the same thing. And that includes national medical organization websites. If anyone wants to learn more, then spend some time on a blood pressure forum, like the one on Reddit.
Forums taught me how misled and upset people are because of the mass confusion of how to measure blood pressure properly, and how many people think they have “white coat syndrome,” although it’s often because of poor measuring procedures both at home and in medical offices. Well, many don’t have that “syndrome,” and I blame the doctors’ offices for promoting this fantasy, which has resulted in them looking innocent and the patient guilty.
When my doctor commented that he thought you get more reliable readings at him with good procedures, I thought: Most people trust that procedures in a doctor’s office must be good, because they are experts, so they go home and copy those procedures, thinking they are correct. They might get lower and better readings at home because they aren’t in a medical office, but if they copy the doctor’s procedures, they still aren’t going to get reliable measurements. This so obvious, it makes wonder who is thinking this through.
At one point, my doctor suggested I bring in my monitor to compare it to theirs to see how accurate it was. The one I purchased was new, and it was a validated monitor listed on the AMA’s monitor validation website (www.validatebp.org). But if I can’t trust the doctor’s office to use proper procedures, it makes me suspicious that their equipment might not be up to date too. Bad procedures generate distrust on other issues.
To expose the problem, my goals were quite simple: 1) To clear the air on what my blood pressure was; and 2) To make my doctor aware that the BP reading procedures being used in that office are extremely poor. I’m not sure how much he was aware of this, but if he wasn’t, then why wasn’t he? Plus, I know that he was relatively new to EZX Health (a large company financed by venture capital) and maybe he didn’t know how bad the procedures were. But he had told me that he had been practicing medicine for 19 years. I thought of the AMA doctor who was quoted in the above article, “27 Sources of Error in Blood Pressure Readings,” who stated that doctors need regular retraining too. Of course, if he knew the procedures were that bad, that’s even worse. That’s where he stands now if he does nothing—IF he takes my criticisms seriously. But I believe the procedures are the norm in many offices. Consequently, I don’t entirely blame the doctor. I hold the entire American medical community, EZX Health, and doctors, including this doctor, responsible. They all share the guilt.
What amazes me most as I look back on all this is how casually the assistant at my doctor’s office measured my blood pressure. The last time she took it was when she had asked me if I wanted her to measure it after the doctor met with me. It was about a minute after the doctor left the room. She rolled in a wheeled stand that had the monitor on it, stood in front of me, put the cusp on my left arm which was hanging straight down from my chair (which didn’t even have armrests—which would not have been high enough anyway) and turned the machine on and read me the numbers. No care was taken in the tightness, nor in the position, of the cuff—nor in the height of the cuff in relation to my heart. As I later learned of the 27 ways measuring can get false readings, I wondered if her instruction had lasted five minutes, because it was worthless in my opinion—after I learned what is good procedure.
How Did We Get Here?
How did the medical community get to the point where poor blood pressure measuring procedures at the doctor’s office have become common? Even the AMA has created a web page for fixing this issue. The doctor that I dealt with was convinced that “white coat syndrome” was the probable cause of high blood pressure readings in their office and that home readings were better indications of blood pressure levels. But he wrote on my appointment summary: “Please continue monitoring your blood pressure at home using your Omron device and follow proper procedures for accurate readings. He never asked about my procedures, so how he could he know? It’s this kind of attitude that is clueless and led to where we are at. I still cannot believe he made that statement.
Where do we go from here?
There are two issues:
What should the patient do if they run into poor procedures? First is to study the issue and be certain. And if you can’t do that or don’t have the time to do that, then question the doctor, but that’s not easy. You could send them a link to this article, or to other information sources. But you must not let them lead you into thinking you have high (or low) blood pressure if you really don’t. And you can also do what I did and buy a blood pressure monitor, and then study how to read your blood pressure (and read what I did in this article), and then tell your doctor.
What should the doctors do? They obviously need to clean up their procedures and make them excellent. And they should also train patients how to properly measure their own blood pressure. Maybe even sell monitors to patients at an affordable price, making sure they are approved devices and creating a connection between the doctor and the patient that can be reliable.
To improve their procedures, doctors can go to the AMA web page designed for that purpose.
Improve training of the doctor and all medical personnel drastically—and keep the training updated 1-2 times a year. This was recommended in the article above (“27 Sources of Error in Blood Pressure Readings“.
How I Suggest They Improve the Medical Office Procedures Immediately
I created this section because I think doctors and companies they work for will complain that they need time and money to make the necessary changes. But I think the below changes could be done quickly at very low cost and gain a lot of value. Of course, a long-term plan will be necessary, but these suggestions will get things done now.
Retrain all medical office personnel ASAP and make sure blood pressure cusps of different sizes are easily available.
Create a setting where the arm with cuff on it can be put at the correct height easily. For example: a height-adjustable table, or a table with pillows to raise the heights for different people.
Make a checklist sheet of paper to be used every time a patient has their blood pressure tested
Put the patient’s name on the checklist, with date and time and the person doing the reading.
The checklist should include questions that the medical person need ask the patient (eg, “Do you need to take a pee, as it will effect your blood pressure reading?”)
Have the medical person sign and date the checklist and the doctor should review it shortly after the reading, and then the doctor should sign it
Notes to the person doing the reading should be on the sheet, that says:
“Never say to that patient that their blood pressure is high, low, good or bad. Only tell the patient the numbers. (This is because one never knows a person’s blood pressure, but only the numbers that were measured at that time and in the patient’s current environment and situation.” The doctor can discuss the numbers with the patient.
Strive for perfection and make all personnel proud that they are using correct procedures.
Spreading the Word
Because of all this, I have decided to make it a mission of mine to make patients, doctors and medical workers more aware of proper blood pressure measuring. I know that doctors (and most medical workers who received good instruction) were instructed at one time on how to properly measure blood pressure, but as quoted in the above-referenced AMA article (“27 Sources of Error…”) regular retraining is required because, “skills in blood pressure measurement decay over time.”
Overall, the good news is that I learned about all this and now know that poor measuring procedures at the doctor’s office can lead to false readings that could lead to unnecessary blood pressure medication. Because I’ve learned this, I have published this article on the internet. Plus, I will also go on forums to spread the word about proper procedures.
In this article, I have decided not to disclose any details, not even the state where I had the experience, besides not mentioning the date or any names involved. Why? Because people often become the targets in bringing about change, and ignore the real problem, which in this case is the processes. It’s best to attack the process and not people. I don’t want to ruin anyone’s reputation if all they are is just ignorant of what’s going on in their offices, although their ignorance can also lead to some bad consequences. And I don’t want to spread rumors about anyone or any group. I want to right a wrong. *
I didn’t tell the doctor about the problems I had with their procedures so they would change how they measured my blood pressure. I told him so they would change them for everyone who came to his office. Plus, I wanted the doctor to understand the problem from the patient’s point of view, including mine.
Links to Online Articles, YouTube Videos and Studies on Measuring Blood Pressure
Below are links that helped in my research to understanding how blood pressure is measured at home and at a medical office. You can get good measurements and bad measurements depending on the procedures used in both locations. A general online search with the text ” measuring blood pressure ” will bring up thousands of links . I always suggest being cautious with the “AI” (Artificial Intelligence) results in Google searches. It sometimes brings up false results. For a list of many YouTube Videos, just go to YouTube.com and search for Measuring Blood Pressure. There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of videos on the subject for both medical office and home measuring.
Below are links I found with short descriptions.
Keep in mind that no single source is 100% accurate. I spent hours researching. If you want to get the best quick advice, then watch the YouTube videos below in the order they are listed. All taken together, they will give you excellent information.
Measuring Blood Pressure at Home and in a Medical Office — YouTube videos
This is another video by a doctor who discusses 11 Mistakes in Measuring Your Own Blood Pressure . In the video he discusses how to properly measure blood pressure and also gives you an idea of much a mistake can change the BP reading. And another excellent, easy to understand video.
*And to this day, as this article gets published a few months after I complained to the doctor, I have never told one person about what happened. This is because I don’t want to spread any rumors, which can lead to negative, unintended consequences. And I have no idea if changes were made at my doctor’s office or the organization that he worked for, since I no longer deal with the doctor or their company. But I bet changes are being made. Most doctors’ intentions are totally honorable and sincere, and in my case, I think I shocked the doctor enough with my criticism that I got his attention—which is what I was hoping for.
In the early days of human evolution, after our ancestors came out of the trees and started walking upright on the ground, there was a discussion among the different parts of the body about who was going to be boss.
First, the brain spoke up and said, “I have all the knowledge, the foresight and all information from all the body parts come to me. I should be the boss.”
Second, the legs spoke and said, “I take us everywhere we go and without me, we couldn’t move around and get food and water. I should be the boss.”
Then the stomach spoke up and said, “I digest all the food that gives us energy to live, move around and do everything. I should be the boss.”
Next, the eyes spoke and said, “I can see everything that goes on and we would just be bumbling around in the dark if it weren’t for me. I should be the boss.”
Then the asshole spoke. “Without me, we would get all stopped up and our legs would wobble, the brain would have a headache, the eyes would be cloudy, and the stomach would be backed up, unable to eat. I should be the boss.”
All the other body parts laughed and joked about how stupid that would be.
So, the asshole decided to show them. It went on strike and didn’t let anything out. The other parts of the body broke down and nothing could get down, so they all got together and decided to make the asshole the boss.
It just goes to show you, that you don’t have to have brains to be the boss; Just be an asshole.
And that’s how just a few people, sometimes even just one person , can control an institution like the U.S. Congress and the House of Representatives.
Although Inflation was high in 2022, the average annual rate from 2009 through October 2022, was one of the lowest in the last 50 years.
In 2022, inflation in the U.S. has hit highs not seen in decades, but how bad is it really and what caused it?
If we look at total inflation in the last two decades, it tells a different story. Looking at the average rate of Inflation over this period, it has been at a normal healthy pace over the long run—and that includes the high rates in 2022. The problem is that there was very low inflation for more than 10 years previously, and then we get very high inflation all at once in 2022. When “normal” inflation is spread out over several years, people don’t feel it as much as when it builds up and hits everyone over a one-year period, like in 2022. But overall, prices in 2022 are about where they would be if we had steady inflation little by little over this period. Hard to believe, bur that’s what the facts show.
Inflation rates by decade, showing some of the lowest rates on record from 2000-2019. Although not shown, the average inflation rate from 2010 through October 2022 is 2.5%.
Because of two major events since 2008, inflation has set records of prolonged periods of very low inflation, then, starting in 2021, the country experienced mild inflation, building up to high inflation in 2022. We can show this as we look back, but first: Is inflation good for the economy, and if so, how much inflation is good and how much is bad?
Is Inflation Good or is it All Bad?
Economists generally agree that a little inflation is necessary for a growing and healthy economy, so the government plans for some inflation. The Federal Reserve bank, the nation’s central bank, has set an annual target of 2% inflation, allowing it to periodically go a bit higher—up to around 3%. When it goes above 3% for a month or two and then drops down, there is little concern, but when it keeps climbing, everyone is concerned.
In the first 10 months of 2022, inflation hit a high of 9.1% and a low of 7.5%, with an average of about 8.3%. But if we average the inflation rate over the previous 10 years, going back to 2013, the rate averages out at 2.5% a year. * This is within the parameters that the Federal Reserve considers comfortable for stable economic growth. Part of the problem is that “stable economic growth” rarely happens for long periods. Growth has always come with downturns and upturns. Adding in unrelated crises, like wars and pandemics, which happen periodically, makes for even less predictable outcomes.
If we go back even further, to 2009, the average inflation rate changes even more. At the end of 2008, there was a major economic collapse—often called “The Great Recession.” But its major effect began a few months later in early 2009. When there is a collapse of the economy, demand drops when people lose their jobs and cut back on their buying. Consequently, inflation is low. There was even deflation in 2009 with a -0.4% inflationary average over the entire year. Subsequently, as the economy recovered and demand increased, Inflation slowly went back up until 2020, when the pandemic hit, which had a major economic impact that no one was certain about. Inflation dropped back down to 1.2% and then, in 2021, as the nation recovered from the pandemic, the rate began to rise until it hit the highs in 2022. In other words, the country experienced very low inflation from 2008 through 2020.
The Great Recession, the Pandemic and the Inflation Rate
These two major events, the Great Recession and the pandemic, instigated significant economic changes that caused inflation to fall and then rise again. But the effects from each event were vastly different and we can learn a lot by comparing the two, especially the inflation rates.
The Great Recession was a deep, but normal, recession with unemployment going up, profits dropping and inflation slowing down below the normal healthy inflation rate levels of around 2%. In the first year, 2009, inflation hit a low of -0.4%. The following year (2010) inflation began to rise, but it was still low at 1.6%. In 2011, as the economy began to recover, it hit 3.2%, then in 2012 it was 2.1% as the recovery grew stronger. Then it hit low inflationary rates in the following years of 1.5% (2013), 1.6% (2014), 0.1% (2015), 1.3% (2016), 2.1% (2017), 2.4% (2018), 1.8% (2019). These are typical of previous recession recoveries. The average of the years 2009 through 2019 was very low at 1.6%—below the average of 2% that the central bank sees as healthy. You might call the recovery from the Great Recession a normal “healthy” recovery that was just like other recoveries, except it was from a deeper and more severe recession than any seen since the Depression in the 30s.
Inflation by month and by year for 2000-2022.
The second big event, the pandemic, hit starting in the second quarter of 2020. Average annual inflation that year was at a very low 1.2%. It had not dropped that low since 2015. The pandemic caused a recession, but it was like no recession that anyone had ever seen before, and its effects were unpredictable. There had not been a pandemic in the U.S. in more than 100 years—and never in a modern economy. It was uncharted territory. The economy had just gone through a recovery over the previous eight years and was in a very strong and healthy condition. The pandemic recession was not linked to the normal business cycle, though. Many lost their jobs—even though demand was there—and small and medium-sized businesses closed down, some permanently, some temporarily. Many started working from home, and many just quit working. Unemployment went up. But the government gave out money and extended unemployment benefits to help those in trouble. That put some money into the economy. But the future was still uncertain.
The Pandemic “Recession”
No one was sure what the economy would do or how the government should respond. The economy had never gone through anything like it. In fact, it was hard to call it a recession since people weren’t really being laid off like in a normal recession. Many people were being temporarily laid off “until the pandemic ended.” During the height of the pandemic, many took early retirement and early Social Security benefits. Many started working for themselves and many joined the cash economy, getting unreported income. Crime went up as society was disrupted, plus crime always goes up when people lose their jobs. The poor suffered most, which always happens during rising unemployment. But generally, people had less money and demand was low, which means inflation would be low.
One could say that the pandemic, with layoffs and businesses closing or cutting back, caused a recession. It was like a recession, but it did not have the usual causes. Plus, it had one other unique aspect: It was the fastest recession recovery in history. The pandemic hit the economy in early 2020, then it basically ended in late 2020, and everyone went back to work, and it was basically over by early 2021—all in one year.
As people went back to work, demand increased and inflation went up, hitting 4.7% in 2021. This happened not only in the U.S. but around the world. The pandemic and its associated “recession” caused factories to close or cut back around the world. Before the pandemic, the world’s economy had become more international than ever before. Products were manufactured overseas and then shipped to consumers around the world. When product demand came back, it was difficult for supply lines to come back quickly. The overseas factories and supply lines to bring goods to America, mainly in Asia, grew “organically” and very slowly over several decades going back to the 70s. When demand came back in America, it came back quickly, but these supply lines to overseas factories had to be restarted. It was like rebuilding a car that was taken apart and put in storage.
With those two events, the Great Recession and the pandemic, the U.S. had record inflationary lows for many years and then record highs in 2022. But the average from the beginning of 2009 through 2022 was still low at 2.25%, which is as good as it gets for a long-term low inflation rate. If we look at inflation by decade, 2.25% over 14 years is exceptionally low. In the attached graph, inflation in the 2000s was 2.54%, in the 1990s it was at 3.08%, and in the 1980s it was at 5.82%. It’s just that the high inflation mid 2021 through 2022 hit all at once and was not spread out over several years. In other words, the prices in 2022 are pretty much what they would have been if the average inflation rate had increased at a relatively low and steady pace over this period. It just hurts more when it comes all at once.
Low Unemployment and Inflation Rate Average
Inflation’s ups and downs from 2012-2021. Although 2022 inflation is not shown here, if we include the inflation rate through October 2022, this period is one of the lowest average annual inflation rates in the last 50 years. The Federal Reserve’s goal is around 2% inflation.
The state of the economy post pandemic from 2021-2022 was a surprise to most everyone, and the biggest surprise was very low unemployment with two jobs for every person looking for a job. Companies, large and small, were struggling to find enough workers. And demand was booming as the economy’s recovery from the pandemic “recession” went into overdrive.
Economists, who mainly did not predict this situation when the pandemic ended in 2020, started to talk about a recession in 2022, even some saying we were already in one. Then came predictions about a coming recession later in 2022. Then it became 2023, then it was mid-2023, and then it was late 2023. And many predict the worst recession of all time.
What is the main problem with a recession? It’s simple: People lose their jobs. For those who have been saying that we are already in a recession are missing this key ingredient: There’s never been a recession with unemployment this low. Economics is not an exact science and considering the failure of at least 90 percent of economists to predict the Great Recession, I wonder about their opinions today. Maybe they are all trying to make up for not seeing the 2008 crash. But then again, even though economics is not an exact science, these “respected economists” talk like it is. Or maybe they’ve learned their lesson from 2008 and are better economists (I hope so). It reminds me of the old saying: Get five economists together and you get six opinions on where the economy is going. Add an unknown factor like a pandemic and you would probably get 10 opinions.
The other big result of the pandemic “recession” recovery was increase demand, which always causes inflation, or at the least, fears of inflation. In 2021, inflation immediately began to rise in the second quarter of 2021, with an average annual rate of 4.7%. In 2022, inflation increased very quickly. Wages were rising, but not fast enough to keep consumers happy. The “recovery” was going too fast, and with the low inflation for the previous 14 years, inflation was catching up all at once—in one year.
So… what can be done about it?
Rising and Falling Interest Rates’ Effects on the Inflation Rate
The main tool that the government has in controlling inflation is the Federal Funds Rate, which sets the interest rate for borrowing. The Funds Rate is set by the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”), and the one person who has the most power for setting the rate is the chairperson of the Federal Reserve. The theory on controlling inflation: In a strong economy, when demand is high, inflation goes up, therefore increase interest rates to slow down the economy and soften demand. In a weakening economy, when demand is low and inflation too low, lower interest rates to spur the economy and keep inflation rates at a healthy 2%. In a recovering economy, with low inflation, raise interest rates incrementally to stave off inflation. Interest rates that are too low for too long create a situation where there is too much easy money in the economy and inflation will go up. And in the long run, being able to borrow money at a very low cost is not a good thing, so bringing rates up to a “reasonable” level is a good thing.
Funds rates 2012 through October 2022. Although the rate was on a slow but steady gradual increase starting in 2015, the rate trend did not continue, but was lowered in 2019, although the economy was doing well as it recovered from the Great Recession.
By the time the Great Recession started in late 2008, the interest rate had dropped steadily from 5.25% in 2007 to around 2% in the third quarter of 2008. The economy started to show signs of weakness in 2007, so the Fed started a regular lowering of the Funds rate to encourage borrowing and investment. By August 2008, it was at 2%. By September, when the crash really came to a head, the rate was dropped to around 1% and by early December it was at .15%. It stayed in that range for the next seven years and the economy continued to recover and grow until the Fed, under Chairwoman Janet Yellen, started to raise the rate in December 2015 when the economy was doing fairly well. Then the rate was slowly but steadily raised over the next three years by Yellen and by the new Fed Chair, Jerome Powell who was appointed by President Trump in early 2018. It reached a low rate of 2.4% by the first quarter of 2019, when Powell indicated the Fed would continue to raise rates. Instead of raising them—and in response to pressure from President Trump—he made no rate change. And then he lowered the rate three times in the third and fourth quarter of 2019, again under pressure from President Trump, even though the economy was continuing to grow. Why the Fed agreed, or succumbed to Trump’s desire, to not only raise rates, but to lower them, was surprising to many, considering that the economy was still doing well. In fact, Fed Chairman Powell later admitted to making a mistake by lowering rates, stating that the economy was in better shape than expected. Lowering the rates was a big mistake, the effects of which would be felt much later.
In late 2019 and early 2020, inflation was below the 2% target. This was before the pandemic caused economic problems. Raising rates would have been the correct thing to do to keep the economy from overheating and causing rising inflation. Instead, only a few months later in the spring of 2020 when the effects of the pandemic took hold, demand fell, and inflation stayed very low the rest of the year. If, instead of lowering rates in 2019, the Fed had continued to raise them, or even just stabilize it, inflation would have been kept in check when the pandemic ended just months later in late 2020 and everyone went back to work. Instead, inflation started to rise in March 2021 and continued a steady increase until it started to increase very quickly in the second quarter of 2021 (going over 5%). This was another time to raise rates incrementally, but that didn’t happen. As it continued into 2022, the Fed woke up and finally started to raise rates monthly to stave off the extreme inflation through 2022. It was too late to ease the pain of low but steady inflation.
But the average annual inflation from 2009 through 2022 was, as noted above, only 2.25%—a very healthy rate over the long run. Rates should never have been lowered in 2019. The Fed should have continued to raise them instead, which is what they were doing in the years leading up to 2019. These were not big jumps, but incrementally small ones of only around .5% a year on average. The rates should have been left alone at around 1.5% in early 2020. Lowering the rate to less than 1% resulted in very low inflation in 2019-2020 and very high inflation in 2021 and 2022. The Fed didn’t follow its own historical guidelines of raising rates in good times to control future inflation.
Consequently, 2022 hit consumers all at once instead of slowly over the years. Again, at only 2.25% average per year, prices in late 2022 are about the same as they would have been anyway. But no one thinks of it like that. Why? Because Trump and Powell are to blame for lowering the rate in 2019, and Biden and Powell are to blame for not raising them in 2021, although that was too late to make a major impact right away. One thing about inflation: it takes time for changes in the Fed rate to affect a massive economy like the U.S., meaning many months to years. Politically speaking, everyone is looking for someone to blame, but no one wants to take the blame.
The Perfect Storm of Inflation
In conclusion, it was good that the economy had low borrowing rates during the pandemic, which was at its worst from the spring of 2020 until late that year. There was no reason to raise them; businesses weren’t borrowing during that time anyway. They were saving money, as were consumers, who experienced record savings rates, which was later money spent in 2021-2022, which helped fuel inflation. But it would have been best to not lower the rate in early 2020, when it was lowered substantially. It was down to 0.5% by April from 1.5% only 4 months earlier. Rates should probably not have been raised during that period but should have been in 2019. They should have at least stabilized the rates in 2020, not lowered them.
High inflation in 2022 was caused by the pandemic more than any single factor, and the pandemic was an event never experienced in over a century—and not at all in the modern world of an international economy. The country, and the world, will continue to feel the effects of the pandemic for years to come, so beware of those who are so certain in their predictions of total collapse in the coming year. Anything could happen, including total economic expansion and prosperity, short-term recession, long-term recession—or even another pandemic. After all, we are in uncharted territory. At the pace the world is changing—even without the pandemic—we will stay in uncharted territory for a very long time, perhaps forever, because it is the incredibly fast pace of technological improvements that is the main driving factor in the modern world—and the slow pace of human evolution that is trying to deal with it that will determine our future. That clash makes the future exceedingly difficult to predict, and a pandemic makes that even more difficult.
The pandemic might have been the most important single factor in the rise in inflation, but it wasn’t the only factor. There were three factors that created the perfect storm of inflation in 2021-2022: First was not continuing to raise rates in 2019, but instead lowering them and doing so again in early 2020. These decisions were not economic decisions, but political decisions. Second was the pandemic. And third was not incrementally raising them again starting in late 2020 and on into 2021, although it might have been too late, anyway. But it couldn’t have hurt the situation. Instead, the rates had to catch up with the economy all at once in 2022. The perfect storm. And no one saw it coming.
Inflation will slow down on its own, mainly because it has caught up with itself.
*******
* Many people don’t understand the monthly inflation reports. It’s important to know that when the inflation rate is 5% one month and then 6% the next month, that doesn’t mean that prices went up 5% the first month and then they rose 6% higher the next month. It means that in the first month, prices were 5% higher than the same month of the previous year, and the following month the prices were 6% higher than the same month the previous year. Over 12 months, the average is taken and that is the annual rate of how much inflation there was over the previous year.
Trump at a Rally. He loves to be the center of attention, surrounded by his Fifth-Avenue voters, who he called “his people”
—
Donald Trump has a following of die-hard, cult-like followers who will support him no matter what he says and does. He called them out in January 2016, in Sioux Center, Iowa. when he stated:
“You know what else they say about my people? The polls, they say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters, okay? It’s like incredible.”
The audience laughed, even though he had just insulted them by suggesting that they are blind, unthinking sheep who will follow him no matter what. They didn’t care—and they knew it was true, anyway. Essentially, Trump was right; His followers to this day have followed him—like blind, unthinking sheep who will follow him no matter what—the “fifth-avenue voters.”
There is no doubt that upon leaving the White House, former President Trump illegally took documents that were not his. These were government-owned documents, many of which were classified. He did not ask for permission because he knew it was not allowed (can you imagine Donald Trump asking for permission for anything?). He illegally took and mishandled classified documents that he had no right to have in his possession. Trump knew that classified documents were closely tracked as to who has them. Knowing this—and that it was illegal—why would he take them in the first place? Since the search of his residence, he has come up with so many excuses that it’s hard to keep track of them. But if you look at how he has handled the return of the documents, his motives become obvious why he took them and why he returned them little by little over 18 months.
Trump Took Classified Documents That are Tracked Closely
For over a year, the Dept. of Justice (DOJ) told Trump and his lawyers that he had more classified documents than he initially said he had. To some, it might appear as though the DOJ didn’t know what he had, but they probably had a good idea. Every classified document is catalogued. Records are kept noting what the document is about, where it is, who has it, where it’s going and when it was removed from a secure location that is the “home” where that document is normally kept. Also recorded is when the document was returned. Plus, everything must be signed for. National Archives oversees all classified documents, and there are several secure locations where they are regularly stored. To name a few: the Defense Department and the individual branches, the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, various intelligence agencies, the White House…and certainly several more. *
The FBI laid out highly classified documents on the floor of Trump’s office to show what they found in his office when executing the search warrant. DOJ photo.
In an organized system, this would all have to be centrally controlled by a computer system run by one person, or, more than likely, a team. That is, of course, if it was organized correctly and run by responsible people. Consequently, the central “controller” of the classified documents that Trump has in his possession should be able to know exactly what he has (unless others who had access to them took the documents). Trump knew this, too. And if Trump, in keeping with his normal behavior, ran a disorganized administration (which is likely), then perhaps these classified documents were handled haphazardly in the White House, and no one really knew what was where. But it is likely that their origins can be all traced back to a starting point to find out who was responsible when each document was “checked out.” With enough investigation, The DOJ could figure out what he has.
Why Trump Took Government Documents
One thing we can say with absolute certainty: Trump took the government documents, both classified and not classified, to gain benefit in some way for himself. The opportunities to use the information are numerous. It could be that there is information in the documents that he can use in the future to learn about people he could be dealing with in his continued business dealings, or even in his future political battles in his lust for power. This could be either to have an advantage by knowing something other parties don’t think he knows, or personal information that he can use against people that would be embarrassing. Or it could be information that would give him an advantage to make a business deal with someone.
There could also be information that he is concerned about that he does not want to get out about himself—to either make him look bad in the public eye, or his personal life, or in a future business deal.
Why Trump Didn’t Want to Return them Right Away
By the time the warranted search of his residence took place, Trump might have already learned what he needed to learn from the classified documents. After all, he had them in his possession for over a year and a half. It is highly likely that they were reviewed, since many of the documents (classified or not) were found in his desk in his personal office, and many were found outside their folders. These are all indicators that he, or someone, had already gone through them. In fact, it is highly likely that he directed someone else, probably a lawyer (to protect his actions, in his mind, through attorney-client privilege), to go through them with instructions for what to look for. Knowing Trump’s penchant for not wanting to read daily briefings while he was President, it is even more than likely that he had someone else review them. But certainly, at the least, Trump oversaw the process. And it is more than likely, that someone took notes, maybe even made copies.
The idea that he has already reviewed the classified documents is even more likely if you look at the timeline of how they eventually were returned to the government. They were returned little by little over a year and a half. In May 2021, four months after he took the documents to Florida, the National Archives requested that Trump return all government-owned documents. That gave Trump four months to have already gone through them. But perhaps he wasn’t done reviewing them yet.
Trump Returns the First Bundle of Documents 11 Months After Taking Them
Trump took 18 months to return the classified documents from Mar-a-Lago
Seven months later, in December 2021, Trump and his team responded that they had 12 boxes, which Archives arranged to have returned to Washington. That was another seven months that Trump had to review them. He most likely had already gone through those 12 boxes in the 11 months since he took them, but especially during the seven months after the government asked for everything to be returned.
One month later, in January 2022, Archivists went to Mar-a-Lago and retrieved another 15 boxes. That gave Trump another month to review them. That probably means he was done reviewing those 15 boxes. It became increasingly obvious that he was returning them little by little.
All the boxes retrieved so far had classified documents in them, besides unclassified material that belongs to the government. Four months later, on May 11, 2022, the DOJ, knowing there were still missing documents in Trump’s possession, got a grand jury subpoena that gave Trump until May 24 to return all of them. Trump asked for an extension and got one for two more weeks—until June 7. But on June 2, Evan Corcoran, Trump’s lawyer, contacted the DOJ and told them to come to Mar-a-Lago and pick up the remaining documents asked for in the subpoena. On June 3, The FBI goes to Florida. Corcoran gives them a large envelope that he claims contains all the remaining classified documents. Trump was obviously done reviewing the documents in the envelope. Corcoran also states (and signs a document saying so) that no other classified documents exist at Mar-a-Lago. The subpoena limits what the FBI can search for, and they leave with the envelope. That gave Trump another five months to review them. He continued to return them little by little.
On Aug. 5, the DOJ, after reviewing the envelope’s contents, which included classified documents, and realizing that there are still more missing documents, got a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago, and the search was conducted on Aug. 8. The FBI seized 33 items, 13 of which are boxes with classified documents in them. Many items were found in Trump’s desk intermixed with personal items. That gave Trump another two weeks to review them.
Why else would Trump return the documents little by little unless he wasn’t done with getting what he needed from them yet?
Is Trump Getting Away With It?
The problem for Trump, although minor at this point, was that he didn’t know they would get a warrant and search his residence for the final documents—and he didn’t know when a search would happen. His lawyers might have warned him that it could happen, and Trump could have sped up his review of the documents that he still had in hopes of finishing it all up. He also might have thought that they wouldn’t dare search his residence with a warrant, and if they did, he felt he could create enough of a furor over a warrant that he could still get away with it. And that’s exactly what happened. Besides, he probably already searched most of the documents over the last 18 months and got what he wanted out of them. He might even have believed that he could use a search of his residence to his advantage. He might have welcomed it. With or without the search, he was in legal jeopardy for having classified documents anyway, so who cares? It could easily have been part of his plan all along. He probably thinks he can get away with it all.
Is Trump Getting Away With Stealing Classified Documents?
There’s good reason to believe that he is getting away with it. After all, he took the documents, and slowly—over a period of a year and a half—returned them little by little, the last time being returned because of a search warrant. But he managed to continuously postpone returning them. Eighteen months is more than enough time to go over all the documents, except perhaps those taken by warrant (since the search was unexpected to some degree). Plus, the Republican party and many of its leaders criticized the DOJ and the FBI immediately after the search.
Trump successfully took the documents—certainly knowing that they were classified—reviewed them and got what he wanted. He will continue to make a big enough stink over the warranted search that he believes he will get away with it, even if it’s a minor punishment and/or fine.
The idea that he took them by mistake, or he thought they were his, or he didn’t review them—is laughable. He had a plan all along and he pulled it off. He weighed the risks, took the documents, reviewed them, and gave them back when he was done with them—at his pace. So far, so good.
How Taking the Documents Could Help Trump
Trump talks about running for President in 2024, but I doubt he will run. He will pretend he will, even if he announces his candidacy, but he will pull out at some point, because he won’t take the chance of being a loser again. He might even use an indictment and conviction for mishandling of classified documents as an excuse—claiming it is all a political witch hunt. That’s because the chances of him spending jail time is almost non-existent. He will then have not only gotten away with it but used it to his advantage to further his political power—outside of government, which is what his real goal is. After all, he has tens of millions of Fifth-Avenue supporters who will follow him wherever he wants to go. They will always believe that he won the election and that he is a victim of persecution.
Questions remain about who reviewed the classified documents: Did they take notes and make copies, and where are those notes? ** The most likely place is in a lawyer’s files. The DOJ needs look for them. The country needs find them.
******
* For more detailed information on how classified documents are handled, go to this link to download a PDF of the Classified Matter Protection and Control Handbook put out by the Dept. of Energy. Start on page 55 of the PDF (skipping the marking information).
For a shorter, and less informative, description of the handling of classified documents from the National Archives, go here.
** Update: In January 2023, more classified documents were found in Trump’s possession, including a laptop where notes had been made from the classified document. This article suggests that all the classified documents were reviewed and notes made. So far, investigator’s have only found this laptop. There are probably dozens, if not hundreds, of notes made, both digitally and on paper, that were a result of Trump and his team’s reviewing of all the documents.
Many gun control advocates want to ban semi-automatic weapons, like the AR-15. I say don’t ban them, license them. Why? Because the Supreme Court has allowed gun control laws, but banning guns is another story. And licensing a weapon is more acceptable than banning one.
Semi-Automatic Weapons are Basically Automatic Weapons – Let’s classify Them as Such
The U.S. has dangerous fully automatic weapons that the citizenry can own: “Title II” firearms. A machine gun is one—a fully automatic rifle. To own a Type II firearm, though, you must be federally licensed, meaning you must prove you are responsible enough—and not “dangerous.” If we want to get dangerous semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15 out of the hands of “dangerous” people, we can classify them as Title II firearms, which allows those who are not dangerous to own them. Like the machine gun, applicants to own one of these weapons must prove to the public that they aren’t dangerous. Considering how many innocent people have been killed by semi-automatics like the AR-15, I want good and thorough proof—the kind of proof that is required to own a machine gun. Licensing could solve the AR-15 problem.
The semi-automatic AR-15
To own a fully automatic weapon, like a machine gun, members of the general public must qualify (police departments, not being the general public, can purchase them*). Rules on ownership, licensing, and registration were first established 88 years ago with the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 (other weapons and devices, besides the machine gun were included). Some of the rules for ownership vary by state, but there are certain Federal rules that apply everywhere, since you need be Federally licensed. There are several restrictions on who does qualify, plus it’s a lengthy process—it can take several months (or more)—and there is a transfer fee.* Qualifying is a high standard, but I rarely hear complaints from the NRA or anti-gun control people about not being able to easily get a machine gun. And I never hear the NRA complain that the 1934 law was the first step in taking their guns away (although I am sure, some did complain). The government did not ban fully automatic weapons, they licensed them.
Several other acts have since passed that amended the 1934 act and brought us to our current situation. These laws include the Gun Control Act in 1968, and the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act (FOPA), The latter was signed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, and it stated that no new machine guns can be sold to the general public, but existing ones manufactured before that date can be—but still under licensing rules already established. Currently, machine guns (and other devices, like silencers and sawed-off shotguns) are labeled as Title II firearms and are under the control of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). In 2016, further changes were made to the National Firearms Act, but the requirements for ownership are basically still the same. In general, all applicants must prove they are a “responsible person.” An application must be submitted and fingerprints taken, along with other identifying information. Both seller and the buyer must get approval before the weapon changes hands.** (For the sake of simplicity, this discussion will only cover the fully automatic weapons, like the machine gun, and not the other Type II weapons.)
What is an Automatic Weapon?
A machine gun is a fully automatic weapon that continues to fire by just holding down the trigger. The difference between a fully automatic weapon and a semi-automatic weapon is that you must keep pulling the trigger on the semi-automatic for it to fire. Both types auto-load the next round when you fire a round, so both types reload automatically without any extra action on the part of the shooter. The AK-47—the weapon of choice for many—has a “fully automatic setting,” but that model is not allowed to be sold in the U.S. to the general public. Only the model with the semi-automatic capability can be sold to the public.
A fully automatic weapon can fire about 400 rounds per minute and a semi-automatic can fire 60-120 rounds per minute (1-2 per second). The Highland Park shooter on the 4th of July 2022 used an AR15-like rifle, a semi-automatic weapon. He fired 70 rounds. Anyone who listens to the tape of the shooting will quickly realize that the shots sound continuous—as fast as you can imagine what it sounds like with one shot immediately following another; it sounds like an “automatic” series of shots. In other words, from the point of view of people being shot in a crowd, there is no major difference. In other words, both are extremely dangerous. To say that one is dangerous and the other is not, is plain stupid; they are both extremely dangerous.
How many of these “used” machine guns are out there in the U.S.? According to the 2015 report by the ATF, there are 543,073. that’s about one machine gun for every 600 people. Estimates for the number of AR-15s is around 20 million (as of 2020). That’s about one for every 16 people.
The Supreme Court Second Amendment Ruling in 2008
Protestors in front of the Supreme Court promote gun control
So, why doesn’t the NRA and the anti-gun control crowd complain that licensing of Type II firearms—like the AR-15—is infringing on their constitutional rights? This is partially because, in 2008, in the first major decision by the court on the 2nd Amendment in almost 70 years, Justice Scalia, in writing for the majority, wrote: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
In the decision the Court gave examples of what they considered lawful control:
Prohibiting dangerous people from possessing firearms
Prohibiting firearms in “sensitive” places, like government buildings and schools
Laws that impose conditions on the commercial sale of firearms.
I imagine there were many diehard gun control opponents who broke down and cried like babies when they heard about the above acceptable legal controls on guns that the Supreme Court declared. (But then again, those who cried like babies, while owning these weapons, should not have guns of any type.)
Essentially, what that means is that the government has the right to control guns. How much control is allowed will be decided in future court decisions, but it currently allows gun control. In other words, we don’t have to ban semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15, we can license them—or just reclassify them as Type II weapons.
“Dangerous” People and “Dangerous” Weapons
Prohibiting dangerous people means licensing people by means of checking to ensure gun buyers are not dangerous people. That is exactly what the laws that restrict the ownership of fully automatic weapons do. And the fact that these laws exist for weapons like machine guns is testimonial to the fact that how dangerous a weapon is can be used to determine if someone can own one based on the weapon alone.
The Supreme Court has not ruled that the 1934 law that requires the licensing of machine guns is illegal. The mere fact that the law puts machine guns in the category of weapons not allowed to be easily acquired without extensive licensing verifies that how dangerous a weapon is can be the determining factor in limiting the ownership of certain firearms because they are dangerous. In other words, you could say that lawful gun control “prohibits dangerous people from possessing dangerous firearms.” It’s really the same as saying that the Supreme Court says that it is acceptable to control the ownership of dangerous firearms.
A dangerous weapon in the hands of a dangerous person; Empty chairs on main street after the Highland Park, Illinois, shooting on July 4th, 2022. Seven people were killed and 30 injured. The shooter was using an AR15-like rifle.
So, the big question becomes obvious: Is a semi-automatic weapon, like the AR-15, a dangerous weapon? The answer is a simple yes, although I guarantee you will find people who will say no, just so they can affirm that the AR-15, and all semi-automatic weapons, are not dangerous enough to fall in the same category as a machine gun, a fully automatic weapon, and therefore should not be classified as a Title II Firearm. Calling a semi-automatic weapon like the AR-15 not as dangerous as an automatic weapon like a machine gun is like saying an atomic bomb is not as dangerous as a hydrogen bomb (technically, the latter is more dangerous). In other words, they are both extremely dangerous. They are both nuclear weapons.
Semi-Automatic weapons are dangerous enough, and the fact that they have killed hundreds of innocent civilians in America in mass shootings easily proves this fact, and we should classify them as a Title II Firearm. When that happens, the country will have solved the current two problems of semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15: We stop them from getting into the wrong hands, and a citizen can still own one—after they prove they are responsible enough to have one.
Licensing and Registration
Controlling semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15 is certainly more acceptable than banning them. But to change their classification to a Type II firearm will still be an uphill battle. There are a few big problems to overcome. Gun owners have been fighting gun registration for a long time, and licensing and registering these semi-automatic weapons will be difficult—but not impossible. Registration is already partially there for fully automatic weapons; there’s just a few more steps to make it happen for semi-automatics like the AR-15. Most likely, this will not be a major hurdle. This is because the public wants it. A minority doesn’t. Plus, the Supreme Court supports laws that control dangerous weapons.
The higher hurdle is registering existing weapons and making that universal for all guns is unrealistic. But our main goal here is about registering all dangerous weapons, like the automatic and semi-automatic weapons. You cannot own or buy a machine gun that is not registered or manufactured before 1986. (Machine guns are not available for sale to the public if they are manufactured after 1986. An interesting note is that no legally owned machine gun has been used in a crime since 1934). But we might be able to create some conditions that will overcome this current ownership problem.
For example, some ideas:
It’s not as simple as just gun control vs gun rights. Gun rights are not that everyone gets to have any gun they want whenever they want.
Make it easy to register, but not mandatory if certain requirements are met. For future purchase of semi-automatic weapons, the Federal Government should create a more expanded or new section of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)—for registration of both existing weapons and new purchases—to manage applications, speeding up the ownership and registration process. Plus, the goal should also be to license every existing semi-automatic weapon like the AR-15. The goal should be to do so over a lengthy period, meaning years. This will be a tough sell, but rules could be set that give current owners sufficient time to be approved for ownership—or to not register at all. The big problem is that there’s about 20 million AR-15s and AR15-like weapons out there.
Laws can get creative to help protect gun owners and the public. The law could state that those who do not register their weapons will be punished if their unregistered weapon is stolen, they do not report it “immediately”—and if it is used in a crime. If used in a crime and its theft was not reported, they could be banned from owning any weapons for a period of time. And if their stolen, unregistered weapon is used to kill someone, they will be banned for life from owning any weapons. Of course, gun owners are still responsible for any negligent action. Existing, responsible gun owners would then not be forced to register their weapons. Rules would also have to be set that require registration and approval if the weapon is sold or inherited.
All of this would be a hard sell, but it’s far more palatable to license these dangerous semi-automatic weapons than to ban them. And perhaps a state should try classifying all semi-automatic weapons in their state as Type II firearms and see how far they get. It could be the beginning of a movement.
**************
*Private security companies can purchase new machine guns for certain situations. Most that do so can only use them outside of the U.S. An example would be a private security firm hired to protect embassies and embassy personnel in other countries. I have also heard that private security firms protecting nuclear power plants can also purchase them.
** Click here for a good description (by a private organization) of the licensing process . Click here for the government-written rules with all the details.
Trump does not really believe he won the election; he knows he legitimately lost. So why is he so fervently fighting the loss?
To put it in simple terms: He doesn’t want to spend the rest of his life known as a loser. To Trump, being a loser is the worst thing you could possibly be. Yet he lost the popular vote in 2016—and again in 2020. That’s a two-time loser, his worst nightmare. And both times, he said he was cheated. Even after the 2016 election, he said he received more votes than Clinton because millions of votes for Clinton were illegal votes.
We need a little background to understand his actions.
Trump planned for years what he was going to do if he lost the 2020 election. He made plans so that no matter what happens in the election, it will be looked upon by his followers—and himself— that he won. If he had won, he would have claimed that all his talk of illegal votes is what caused the election to be fair and legitimate. If he had lost, he would have claimed that the election was illegal, and he really won—which is exactly what he did.
Laying Out the Groundwork in Case He Loses the Election
Trump is a con man—and what all con men do is they always lay out the groundwork ahead of time for their con, so that they will be believed when the time comes. In other words, he created a “win-win” situation for himself. And Trump knows he has to portray himself as though he sincerely believes he won the election.
He laid out this groundwork for at least four years. You could say it started right after his election in 2016 when he claimed that he won the popular vote, which Clinton won by more than three million votes. Trump’s claim was that the voting was fraudulent and that millions illegally voted for Clinton—and that he actually won by several million. He never backed off this claim. He promoted this theme for the next four years, increasing his claims of illegal voting right up to the 2020 election. His main motivation? He didn’t want to live the rest of his life being labeled a loser.
The master con man at work. Trump’s followers believe he won the election.
Insurance So It Looks Like He Won the Election
The entire scheme was insurance. Insurance that if he lost, he could make the claim that he won, and his “True-Believer” followers—the 5th Avenue voters—would believe whatever he says without question. How better to ensure that your followers will continue to support you—and do so for the rest of your life? Plus, you can claim—for the rest of your life—that you actually won because your followers will believe there was cheating in the counting, that there were voting machines that were rigged and, on top of that, there were millions of illegal voters—all of which voted for Clinton.
Trump smiling as his followers cheer for him. They believe him when he says he won the election, even thought the only proof he offered is that he said it was so. That’s enough for his followers.
In other words, Trump was setting the stage that no matter what happened, he wins the election—regardless of whether he legally and formally no longer holds the office. Since the results came in from the 2020 election, he has been stalling, working behind the scenes to bolster up this claim that he really one. He’d been working on the plan for the last few years. All he had to do was continue to make his false claims.
Trump Insults His Followers — the Fifth-Avenue Voter
Trump doesn’t like to govern. He leaves that to others around him. As president, he did what he always does: he talks (and that includes “talking” on Twitter). He believes he can talk his way into or out of any situation. He seeks power and if he can’t have it the way he wants it—which he couldn’t get as President because of the limitations of the office—he’ll take it in another way: By having a following of die-hard, cult-like followers who will support him no matter what he says and does. He called them out in January 2016, in Sioux Center, Iowa. Trump then stated, “You know what else they say about my people? The polls, they say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters, okay? It’s like incredible.” The audience laughed, even though he had just insulted them by suggesting that they are blind, unthinking sheep who will follow him no matter what. They didn’t care—and they knew it was true, anyway. Essentially, he was right; His followers to this day have followed him—like blind, unthinking sheep who will follow him no matter what—the “fifth-avenue voters.”
Donald Trump claims he won the election, knowing that he lost. His people believe he won.
After the Election Trump fervently Continued the Claim That he Won the Election — Why?
Trump knew, if people were to believe his claim, that he must continue after the election to fight to the end that he actually won. Otherwise, his supporters would never believe he really believed it. If he were to just accept his loss and move on, it would be like admitting he was wrong all along. After all, if there really was cheating in the election to elect the President of the United States, and the person who lost actually won, that would be the crime of the century. The loser would have to fight to the end to prove his credibility. And that’s exactly what Trump did—and continues to do. He will make this claim as long as he is alive. Does anyone really believe that he will ever call himself a loser? And what has he got to lose by promoting this lie forever? He has his 5th-Avenue voters who believe whatever he says. And the thing is, his strategy has worked. People fell for the con. They all drank the Kool-Aid and will be his supporters—even if it kills them—until they day they die.
What Trump Really Likes
He likes to be at the head of a crowd that adores him and cheers him on as the greatest leader and solver of all problems; “only he can fix it.” He loves an adoring crowd more than anything—more than being President. I don’t believe he likes being President as much as he likes being able to draw a crowd that adores him. It’s really no work. Being President requires work. When he goes before a crowd, he never really says anything of substance. When he is on the stage, he just claps his hands for himself, talks about how popular he is and criticizes others. When he reads a teleprompter—the closest thing to him making a speech—it’s obvious it was written by someone else. If he runs for President again, it will not be serious, it will be a façade. He’ll do it to promote himself and his following. He’ll make it look like he is running, so that the crowd will get excited. He might use the excuse that it’s rigged, and that he won’t run under those conditions.*
He’ll hold rallies and make speeches, clapping for himself when he has nothing to say to his adoring followers. And Trump will continue to claim he won the 2020 election and that he is really the legitimate president. He’ll claim he won until his last breath. With such fervent dedication, Trump will continue to lead people to believe that he won the election.
One thing is for certain: He will not, under any circumstance, take the chance that he might lose another election, which means he will not really run. He’ll pretend he’s running.
And the fifth-avenue voters will continue to give him money to pay for it all—and enough to put lots of money in his pocket.
************************
* UPDATE (August 30, 2022): Facing a threat of an indictment—and possible conviction—for stealing classified documents that belong to the people (or at the least, conviction for obstruction of justice), Trump could find an opportunity to possibly blame a conviction on his inability to run for President in 2024, because if he is convicted, he will not be allowed to run. And I believe he will not run under any circumstance. He will pretend to run and then either never announce it officially or withdraw for some made-up reason. But he will not take the chance of being a loser for the third time—and his main goal is still the same: he does not want to spend the rest of his life known as a loser.
He could get a conviction without any jailtime, since others, General Petraeus being a good example, have taken classified documents, were convicted and never faced jail time. Petraeus was convicted of mishandling classified information and was just fined, along with two years probation—after pleading guilty. But Trump might have to plead guilty to stay out of jail, like Petraeus did—and Trump will have a real problem ever admitting guilt.
Trump doesn’t want to be President, he just wants the power he yields over people who follow him blindly. The possibility of him trying to run for President and not being able to because of a legal reason, ie, he’s been convicted, or even just indicted, gives him a great opportunity. It will be a perfect situation for him; he can claim for the rest of his life that he won and was not allowed to run for President because people knew he would win and it’s all a political persecution. If it happens, It’s almost as though he couldn’t have planned it out better.
The short answer to why we must end the two party system and grow a third party is to quit the extreme division which is down to a 50-50 split in the country. Our current situation is the inevitable outcome of the American political system, which ensures there will never be a strong third party—the existence of which would be a powerful incentive for compromise.
We need more political parties to promote compromise — and this is how we build them
Is having only two parties representative of what life is like? Are their only two groups of people who believe in only two different ways to run the world, or a country? No, there are many views on how a country is run, and none of them are perfect. That includes the two-party system, which creates the us-or-them mentality. Having only two parties is like having only two judges, when you need a third judge to make judgments decisive—and compromising. Do people want a third party, or a fourth or a fifth—or several? In recent years there has been a growing desire for a third party as more and more people register as independents. Three parties would be many times superior to two parties—more than three would be even better. If we don’t end the two-party system, America’s divisiveness will grow and nothing will stop that. All this talk about we need to just get along is a waste of energy, because that’s not how things change.
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” — Buckminster Fuller
In simpler terms: If you change the environment, people change.
Why do Third Parties in America Never Succeed?
“There will never be a viable third party in America unless we have runoff elections.”
As long as we do not have runoff elections, we will never have a viable third party—or, for that matter, several parties. Right now, in almost every place in the United States—and certainly in the presidential election—the candidate who wins is the one who gets a plurality of the vote—which means whoever gets the most votes (even if it’s not the majority of votes). This means that if their are three candidates in three different parties and one gets 49%, another gets 48%, and another gets 3%, the one with 49% wins—which means the victor is elected by a minority! It would also hold true if one got 34%, another got 33% and another got 32%, the winner would be the candidate with 34%—a minority, and a small one at that. Rule by the minority is dictatorship* Rule by majority is democracy.
Even with a third party, without runoff elections, a small minority can win. In the above example where one party received 3% of the vote, if there was a runoff, there would be another election with just the two top candidates and both of the two main parties would be talking compromise with that third party in order to win the runoff. This gives the third party great power, but the real result is there was compromise. Of course without the runoff, the winning candidate would be elected with a minority of the votes.
We need more choices than just Democrat or Republican
A Nation Divided in Two
The current plurality system is a bad system—and that’s the reason there are only two parties in this country. Again, it’s us or them. It is the Democrats or the Republicans. It’s truly a nation divided in two. How many parties does a nation of 331 million people need? At least three, maybe a few more, but one thing is for certain: dividing us all into just two parties is wrong—and stupid. We must end the two party system.
In many elections, I voted for my candidate of choice for only one reason: He was the best of only two choices and I didn’t like the two choices very much. Or should I say, I voted for the candidate who I disliked the least. Yes, there are periodically a few small political parties with good candidates, but if I voted for one of them, because of the plurality system of electing, I would probably be taking a vote away from the candidate I liked most of the two big parties, and I would be helping to elect the candidate I liked least.
Under those conditions, a third party will never grow. Most people will wise up to this, but not all. Some people will think they are moving forward by voting for a third party because that’s what they believe in. Those people don’t believe in compromise, which is the cornerstone of democracy. But with runoff elections, a third party (or several) can grow—and quickly and easily. Probably in one cycle.
How Runoff Elections Will Grow More Parties
With runoff elections, where getting more than 50 percent of the vote decides the winner, a third party can force an election into a runoff and this gives power to the third party. Candidates from the two big parties will have to compromise with the third party to win—and compromise is the essence of a democratic republic. With a runoff election, a voter has real power by voting for a third party, because the people will realize that if enough vote for a third candidate (even if he is an independent and not a member of a political party), then the election will automatically go into a runoff. This gives each person who votes much greater power—and a great incentive to vote, increasing the number of people who will vote—as their vote will really matter.
The Electoral College — Time to End a Bad Idea
In the U.S., we have state and local elections, and a national election for the President (and Vice President). Because of the Electoral College, the national election system is broken. In the 2000 election and in the 2016 election, the President was elected by the Electoral College—without winning the popular vote. That should be proof enough for all those who believe in democracy to end the Electoral College. In both elections we had a President who was elected with a minority of the vote. One went to war, which cost trillions and tens of thousands of dead. The other President ruled in a dictatorial manner, often proclaiming his powers were unlimited, a true failure in democracy. Without getting rid of the Electoral College, we cannot have runoff elections for the Presidency—and these two examples are proof that we need a President elected by the will of the people.
How Would Three or More Parties Govern in Congress?
With only two parties, one on the “political right” and one on the “political left,” those who want to compromise on the passage of a law have no choice if they don’t agree with the majority of their party. This happens constantly in the current system with both parties. With a third more “centrist” party, many in both parties will join the third party and both of the major parties will have to compromise with a third party to get anything passed.
There could even be two centrist parties, but no matter what, the power structure that the two parties currently enjoy will be broken down and laws will pass on compromise. The era of two parties—”us or them”—will end. And the people will see that the centrist parties have power and they will be even more likely to grow. Even if we had a very small, more centrist, third party of just three congressional members, the two main parties would fight to compromise with it because a majority must be reached to pass a law. That will cause more growth of a third party—or even more parties. Members will start talking to other party members to gain their support. Candidates who don’t understand the value of compromise, will not be elected—unless they get voted in as members of extreme parties. But even in that situation, other parties will have to compromise with the extreme parties.
The End of “Across the Aisle”
Ending the two party system will also mean that the two chambers of congress will end the division in seating, from two groups—where currently the two parties talk about each other as those “across the aisle”—to at least three groups (if not more). How stupid is that? Members of different parties will then be sitting on the same side of the “aisle.” God forbid! But it’s either that, or redesign and rebuild the seating layout in both houses—maybe add more aisles. That would be a good thing.
As long as we have only two parties in the United States, the divisiveness will grow and kill the country. There is a lot of talk that everyone’s attitude needs to change. Well—duhhh! Many have been saying that for decades. But that will not happen by just hoping it happens, or even working at it. We must change the system. And the sooner the better. End the two party system before it’s too late.
*********
* Dictatorship is often thought of as one person being a dictator. But all dictators have the support of a large segment of the population when they come to power. All dictators come to power because of that support. Sometimes dictators come to power with a majority of the vote and that would be the dictatorship of the majority (which can also happen in a democracy), but constitutions are set up to protect the rights of the minority, the U.S. Constitution, being a prime example of one. But all political conflicts are about the rights of the majority vs. the rights of the minority. That’s where the political arena is.
According to the Center for Disease Control, during 2017, approximately one third (82 million) of U.S. adults reported having hypertension, and an estimated three quarters of those with hypertension (62 million) reported using antihypertensive medication.
I am not a doctor, and this article does not pretend to offer medical advice, but information.
After my experience with sloppy blood-pressure-measuring procedures in a medical office that led a doctor to telling me that I had high blood pressure, when I didn’t, I decided to research correct procedures and share my experience with others.
It is strongly recommended that readers do their own research to learn for themselves. To help in researching, I have placed many links in this article (and at the end of the article) about proper procedures that are not only recommended by individual doctors, but are also recommended by the medical community, which is trying to get the word out to doctors about poor practices in medical offices that need to be eliminated—and replaced with proper procedures.
It should also be noted that all the procedures discussed in this article are for an average-sized adult. For adults who are way outside the average in height, weight and health, they should be aware that these differences could effect procedures, including considerations about cuff height.
Procedures can also be different for children, and parents should be consulting with a doctor, but that doesn’t mean that every doctor is always doing everything correctly, even for children. Parents should always seek out correct procedures on their own and educate themselves and ask questions.
I also do not discuss any blood pressure numbers. That’s a whole new discussion, and there is no absolute number that is correct. All doctors do not absolutely agree on this, and the standards in the U.S. and other parts of the world do not agree. Again, study this for yourself.
Walking Naturally You Connect to the Ground with Two Points; With Poles It’s Four Points
The problem is that when a hiker with poles is ready to make a steep step down [a rocky trail], instead of using their body’s leg strength and natural balancing ability, they use the poles. When people walk without poles, they only have to find two points to connect to the ground: their two legs. With poles, they have to find four points, and two of those points are going to take some of the body’s weight, even most of it at times. This is one way that causes them [hikers with poles] to go slower.
All our lives, we learn to walk with two contact points to the ground. Then poles come along and make it four. You couldn’t design a more confusing way to screw up the walking and balancing habits that come from [a lifetime of] walking and from evolution. At some point, the body can’t go back to the normal way of walking; it’s too late.